In order to protect the environment, many restaurants have recently avoided giving out drinking straws. Of course some people agree, but it also makes many people dissatisfied.
Those in favor believe that plastic drinking straws are not environmentally friendly and will clog the noses of sea turtles when washed into the sea.
Opponents believe that drinking straws were invented to facilitate life drinking straw, and abandoning drinking straws will affect people’s livelihood.
So customers who asked for a drinking straw grabbed and beat the clerk at McDonald’s, which sang about environmental protection, for just a small plastic tube.
Environmental protection itself is a good thing
But some packaging is indeed redundant, and bc data vietnam disposable consumer goods also create a lot of waste. McDonald’s in Japan not only provides drinking straws, but they are also wrapped in a paper sleeve.
Even with the hygiene concerns, I still find it a bit redundant. Japanese people like packaging very much and wrap everything they buy in multiple layers.
If you go to a slightly higher-end department store to buy clothes, the packaging may be thicker than the clothes themselves.
Therefore, some people have always advocated reducing packaging. The outer layer is always something that needs to fall off, and has no practical use other than aesthetics.
However, drinking straws are different and have their practical uses. You said you can still drink the drink without the drinking straw.
The situation is like a computer without a mouse
In fact, you can still use the keyboard to photoscape is a free and very simple photo editing program operate it, but the difficulty has increased by more than one level.
If drinking straws are indispensable for the convenience of life. some environmentalists want to move the turtle out.
Under the shield of “environmental protection”, the convenience of life turns into immoral behavior.
If humans can endure ice cubes touching their teeth, nature will have one less piece of garbage. Why not? In fact, there are many options besides ditching the drinking straw.
Bringing your own stainless steel drinking tubes is one of them
But considering the convenience factor, degradable b2b fax lead environmentally friendly drinking tubes are also a way out, and indeed some restaurants are using them.
Ultimately, “environmental protection” should be about improving the way tools are used, rather than discarding the tools themselves drinking straw, otherwise it is just anti-intellectual behavior.
The particles emitted by diesel vehicles will pollute the air, so we should switch to electric vehicles, or invent solar vehicles, wind turbines drinking straw, etc., instead of abandoning the tool “vehicle”.
A restaurant, under the banner of “reducing plastic”, no longer provides drinking straws instead of using substitutes made of other materials.
It is just using the halo of “environmental protection” to save costs and does not solve the existing problems.
Small restaurants may still use excuses such as insufficient funds drinking straw, but multinational consortiums such as McDonald’s are really shouldering the responsibility.
The drinking straw war means that companies have. There for failed to shoulder their due responsibilities, and instead put customers in the position of making moral choices.
Adding idioms may improve the look and feel of the article drinking straw, but a good article is not simply made up of idioms. “Reducing plastic” has an “environmental protection” component.
But “environmental protection” cannot be achieved by “reducing plastic” alone. Thinking about how to use sustainable development methods to improve human life is true environmental protection.
